General Tolerance Iso 2768-mk Instant

Section D — Problem solving & design considerations (40 marks) 13. (10) You are designing a bracket with multiple features. Explain, with brief justification, which features you would: a) apply ISO 2768‑m to (3 examples), b) require specific tighter tolerances (3 examples), and c) select ISO 2768‑k for (2 examples). 14. (8) Calculate cumulative tolerance stack-up for three aligned features in series: A, B, and C, nominal lengths 15 mm, 25 mm, and 40 mm respectively, all unspecified on the drawing and ISO 2768‑m applies. Use the simplified table above to compute worst‑case total length tolerance and resulting possible total length range. 15. (8) For the same features as Q14 but B is specified with a tighter machining tolerance of ±0.05 mm (explicit), while A and C remain under ISO 2768‑m, compute the worst‑case total length range. 16. (6) Explain how note “ISO 2768‑m unless otherwise specified” can reduce drawing clutter but also identify two risks associated with relying on general tolerances. 17. (8) A customer requires interchangeable parts with consistent function across suppliers. Propose a concise set of drawing practices (6 actionable items) to ensure interchangeability while using ISO 2768‑m where appropriate.

Duration: 90 minutes Total marks: 100

Section C 10. Ø12 H7 explicit callout controls; ISO 2768 does not override an explicit tolerance. H7 defines specific limits (hole basis tolerance); general tolerance ignored for that dimension. 11. Not acceptable for precision fit; drawing must specify tolerances (e.g., shaft Ø19.98–20.00 and bore Ø20.02–20.05) or use fit designation (e.g., H7/g6) to guarantee 0.02–0.05 mm clearance. 12. Consequences: possible assembly interference or functional failure; actions: reject/ rework part or negotiate acceptable nonconformance and update drawing tolerance notes; implement supplier corrective action. general tolerance iso 2768-mk